Wind flow modeling in urban areas is usually performed by means of Wind-Tunnel (WT) testing or Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. Results obtained with both techniques can be affected by the boundary conditions. This study aims at investigating how two sets of inflow conditions, termed set 1 and set 2 and calculated respectively using the equations proposed by Richards and Hoxey (1993) and Tominaga a al. (2008), may affect the accuracy of the results in terms of mean wind speed, turbulent kinetic energy, yaw and pitch angles when predicting wind flows in urban areas. 3D steady RANS simulations were performed for a selected urban area ("Quartiere La Venezia" in Livorno, Italy). WT tests on the same urban model were used to validate the CFD simulations. Mean wind profiles at 25 positions in the urban area were compared and the statistical performance was quantified using four metrics for both sets of inflow conditions. The results obtained using the two sets of inflow conditions showed comparable performances in terms of wind flow predictions in the urban canopy, which means that at the building scale there is no need to use more accurate conditions because they are as effective as the simpler ones.

Large-scale forcing effects on wind flows in the urban canopy: Impact of inflow conditions

Ricci, A.
;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Wind flow modeling in urban areas is usually performed by means of Wind-Tunnel (WT) testing or Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. Results obtained with both techniques can be affected by the boundary conditions. This study aims at investigating how two sets of inflow conditions, termed set 1 and set 2 and calculated respectively using the equations proposed by Richards and Hoxey (1993) and Tominaga a al. (2008), may affect the accuracy of the results in terms of mean wind speed, turbulent kinetic energy, yaw and pitch angles when predicting wind flows in urban areas. 3D steady RANS simulations were performed for a selected urban area ("Quartiere La Venezia" in Livorno, Italy). WT tests on the same urban model were used to validate the CFD simulations. Mean wind profiles at 25 positions in the urban area were compared and the statistical performance was quantified using four metrics for both sets of inflow conditions. The results obtained using the two sets of inflow conditions showed comparable performances in terms of wind flow predictions in the urban canopy, which means that at the building scale there is no need to use more accurate conditions because they are as effective as the simpler ones.
2018
CFD simulation
RANS
Urban wind flow
Inflow conditions
Statistical performance
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12076/14690
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact