The fact that Parsing and Generation share the same grammatical knowledge is often considered the null hypothesis (Momma and Phillips 2018) but very few algorithms can take advantage of a cognitively plausible incremental procedure that operates roughly in the way words are produced and understood in real time. This is especially difficult if we consider cross-linguistic variation that has a clear impact on word order. In this paper, I present one such formalism, dubbed Expectation-based Minimalist Grammar (e-MG), that qualifies as a simplified version of the (Conflated) Minimalist Grammars, (C)MGs (Stabler 1997, 2011, 2013), and Phase-based Minimalist Grammars, PMGs (Chesi 2005, 2007; Stabler 2011). The crucial simplification consists of driving structure building only using lexically encoded categorial top-down expectations. The commitment to the top-down procedure (in e-MGs and PMGs, as opposed to (C)MGs, ) will be crucial to capture a relevant set of empirical asymmetries in a parameterized cross-linguistic perspective which represents the least common denominator of structure building in both Parsing and Generation.

Parameters of cross-linguistic variation in expectation-based Minimalist Grammars (e-MGs)

cristiano chesi
2023-01-01

Abstract

The fact that Parsing and Generation share the same grammatical knowledge is often considered the null hypothesis (Momma and Phillips 2018) but very few algorithms can take advantage of a cognitively plausible incremental procedure that operates roughly in the way words are produced and understood in real time. This is especially difficult if we consider cross-linguistic variation that has a clear impact on word order. In this paper, I present one such formalism, dubbed Expectation-based Minimalist Grammar (e-MG), that qualifies as a simplified version of the (Conflated) Minimalist Grammars, (C)MGs (Stabler 1997, 2011, 2013), and Phase-based Minimalist Grammars, PMGs (Chesi 2005, 2007; Stabler 2011). The crucial simplification consists of driving structure building only using lexically encoded categorial top-down expectations. The commitment to the top-down procedure (in e-MGs and PMGs, as opposed to (C)MGs, ) will be crucial to capture a relevant set of empirical asymmetries in a parameterized cross-linguistic perspective which represents the least common denominator of structure building in both Parsing and Generation.
2023
minimalist grammar, parsing, generation, merge, move, agreement
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12076/12937
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact