In this paper we will analyse the production and interpretation of the forms of the present perfect (passato prossimo) in children’s Italian. Crosslinguistic research on the production of tense morphology in child language has shown that young children use past or perfective forms mainly to refer to telic predicates and present or imperfective forms mainly to refer to atelic predicates. However, this pattern, which has come to be known as the Aspect First Hypothesis (Antonucci & Miller, 1976), has been challenged in a number of comprehension studies. We will focus on the distribution of auxiliaries in the first forms of the present perfect. First, since in Italian there are two auxiliaries, be for unaccusatives and have for transitives, we will show that be is mastered earlier than have: children distinguish between verb classes and properly assign be to unaccusatives which are inherently telic predicates and have to transitives and unergatives which are atelic. Second, we will test the validity of the Aspect First Hypothesis by presenting the results of two experimental tasks: the production and the comprehension of the perfective forms of have with telic and atelic predicates. The results will show that the aktionsart of verbs is relevant to account for the production of early auxiliaries till the age of 5. Furthermore, the perfective reading is not interpreted properly with atelic unergatives till later stages (7 years). We propose that telicity is not matched with the perfective morphology, but the presence of an overt direct object, that measures out the event denoted by the verb, triggers the production of the present perfect in child Italian. The syntax of verb classes influences the early aspectual interpretation. When an internal argument is selected within the VP (unaccusatives and transitives), children are more likely to produce and analyze perfective auxiliaries in an adultlike way: the internal arguments give a natural endpoint to the events denoted by the verbs and are overt syntactic cues of telicity that influence the pattern of distribution of early aspectual auxiliaries.
Early Auxiliaries in Italian L1: a Syntactic analysis
Lorusso P
2016-01-01
Abstract
In this paper we will analyse the production and interpretation of the forms of the present perfect (passato prossimo) in children’s Italian. Crosslinguistic research on the production of tense morphology in child language has shown that young children use past or perfective forms mainly to refer to telic predicates and present or imperfective forms mainly to refer to atelic predicates. However, this pattern, which has come to be known as the Aspect First Hypothesis (Antonucci & Miller, 1976), has been challenged in a number of comprehension studies. We will focus on the distribution of auxiliaries in the first forms of the present perfect. First, since in Italian there are two auxiliaries, be for unaccusatives and have for transitives, we will show that be is mastered earlier than have: children distinguish between verb classes and properly assign be to unaccusatives which are inherently telic predicates and have to transitives and unergatives which are atelic. Second, we will test the validity of the Aspect First Hypothesis by presenting the results of two experimental tasks: the production and the comprehension of the perfective forms of have with telic and atelic predicates. The results will show that the aktionsart of verbs is relevant to account for the production of early auxiliaries till the age of 5. Furthermore, the perfective reading is not interpreted properly with atelic unergatives till later stages (7 years). We propose that telicity is not matched with the perfective morphology, but the presence of an overt direct object, that measures out the event denoted by the verb, triggers the production of the present perfect in child Italian. The syntax of verb classes influences the early aspectual interpretation. When an internal argument is selected within the VP (unaccusatives and transitives), children are more likely to produce and analyze perfective auxiliaries in an adultlike way: the internal arguments give a natural endpoint to the events denoted by the verbs and are overt syntactic cues of telicity that influence the pattern of distribution of early aspectual auxiliaries.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
