Epistemic uncertainties about future earthquakes are included in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) using logic tree. Each model in the logic tree is assigned a weight based on the judgements provided by a panel of expert. In this paper we raise some methodological challenges to the use of experts in PSHA. We then present an alternative approach to include the scientist’s confidence in an estimate for a quantity of interest. The pro- posed methodology extends Brian Hill’s and Richard Bradley’s "confidence approach". We finally compare our approach with the standard (Bayesian) approach.

The Use of Experts in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis: Towards a Confidence Approach

Luca Zanetti;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Epistemic uncertainties about future earthquakes are included in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) using logic tree. Each model in the logic tree is assigned a weight based on the judgements provided by a panel of expert. In this paper we raise some methodological challenges to the use of experts in PSHA. We then present an alternative approach to include the scientist’s confidence in an estimate for a quantity of interest. The pro- posed methodology extends Brian Hill’s and Richard Bradley’s "confidence approach". We finally compare our approach with the standard (Bayesian) approach.
2024
978-1-84890-455-2
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA), Logic Tree, Epistemic Uncertainty, Expert Judgement, Confidence Approach.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12076/16877
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact